The Supreme Court vs The Constitution eBook Gerald Walpin
Download As PDF : The Supreme Court vs The Constitution eBook Gerald Walpin 
They’re on a “rampage,” writes Gerald Walpin, one of the country’s top litigators, in his astonishing new book, The Supreme Court Vs. The Constitution.
And it takes just five of them to lay waste to the rights of 300 million Americans.
A mostly bare majority of justices of the United States Supreme Court, the only judicial body enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, have spent recent decades reversing, revoking and rescinding the fundamental guarantees of that sacred document to the people of America.
They’ve freed thousands of murderers, rewritten sound and time-tested laws, crippled religious liberty, enabled the spread of pornography and immorality. They have ignored the letter and spirit of the Constitution and its amendments in grabbing power that rightfully belongs to the Executive and Legislative branches, the states − and, ultimately, the people.
Gerald Walpin, who prosecuted criminals and pursued crooked bureaucrats as a federal Inspector General nominated by President George W. Bush and confirmed by the U.S. Senate, and, many years before, as a top prosecutor for the Department Of Justice in New York, dramatically sets out the deliberate push by a bare majority of Supreme Court justices to usurp the role of our country’s elected lawmakers and executives.
The justices time and again seize the rightful authority of those we elect to represent us, and with unchallengeable arrogance undermine the “inalienable rights” that long have made the United States the world’s brightest beacon of freedom, democracy, and personal security.
According to Mr. Walpin, who also served for many years as head of litigation at a noted New York law firm, the Framers of the Constitution and those who drafted and championed the Bill of Rights and the 17 additional amendments carefully considered and meant every word they wrote. But the “activist” justices of the Supreme Court pay little heed to their language or intent as they “legislate from the bench” and deprive us of rights that our Constitution was adopted to protect.
His book carefully lays out the history of court rulings, providing quotations from the justices’ own writings and dramatic actual facts from cases, to document each illegitimate assumption of power by activist justices. Yet it is so clearly and simply written that one does not have to be a lawyer to see unequivocally where the fault lies.
Elegantly crafted and flawlessly researched, The Supreme Court Vs. The Constitution will have Americans on their feet, demanding that these justices obey and uphold the laws of this land, and that future appointees to the Court not be confirmed unless they pledge to do so. Gerald Walpin’s work will spark a revolution in thought about the Supreme Court, and a new outpouring of appreciation for the brilliant legacy of America’s Founding Fathers.
The Supreme Court vs The Constitution eBook Gerald Walpin
This book reveals how much activist judges have overstepped their authority since the very beginning of our great nation. What I find most troubling is that all judges have to swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution and then most of them seem to just ignore that oath. Maybe they don't understand the words which is even more troubling if that's the case.Just one note to the author in case he reads these reviews: if I'm playing golf and I happen to shank a shot and utter the word $***, I'm not literally referring to my 8-iron as a piece of excrement. The word is used as nothing more than a feeling of exasperation.
Product details
|
Tags : Buy The Supreme Court vs. The Constitution: Read 14 Books Reviews - Amazon.com,ebook,Gerald Walpin,The Supreme Court vs. The Constitution,Significance Press,LAW Judicial Power
People also read other books :
- DOUBT The Madeleine McCann Mystery Gone Girl Book 1 edition by Nick van der Leek Lisa Wilson Professional Technical eBooks
- Temptation in Texas Logan and Lauren eBook Lynda Chance
- Rembrandt 240 Masterpieces Annotated Masterpieces Book 20 edition by Maria Tsaneva Raia Iotova Arts Photography eBooks
- Immigration Law Handbook with CDROM Publisher Editorial Staff 9781422482353 Books
- Life and Evolution How FunctionRelated Molecular Selection Started It All Dr George Constantin Theodoridis 9780692758014 Books
The Supreme Court vs The Constitution eBook Gerald Walpin Reviews
The Supreme Court vs The Constitution is a book that I was carving out time to read, imagining that it might be written in academese, a language that I understand but read slowly. Instead, Gerald Walpin has written a book that gives you the very practical, common sense approach to many important issues - the Miranda decision and the Exclusionary Rule are two examples - then gives you an assessment by professionals in the fields of law and criminology, then a look at what the constitution does or doesn't say on the subject and lastly, and most unjustly, how supreme court justices have often corrupted the intent of our constitution for their own political purposes. It's a book that brings the author's wealth of knowledge along with his vast experience as both prosecutor and defense lawyer to help us understand the daily impact of some of these decisions and how they have adversely upended the goals of an orderly and fair society. Though it's scholarly enough to be used as a reference book, it's readable enough for any smart citizen who cares about our democracy and the bedrock foundation on which it is based. Read it and become better informed and much better equipped to judge the judges. marilyn penn
I highly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in how and when the Supreme Court has deviated from what our founding fathers intended. The author reviews cases where decisions clearly depart from what is written in the Constitution and sometimes even seem to defy logical explanation. Whether you agree or not with all the premises of the author you will find this lucidly written book well worth your time.
A bit of a complicated read, at times, but an interesting disussion of our move away from federalism. Well worth the time.
In this polarized world, it is refreshing to have a sensible approach to hot button issues. Gerry Walpin is a conservative but not extreme. "You can disagree without being disagreeable" is his mantra. His book is educational and persuasive.
This book details the distinction between what the Court should do and what the legislature should do. Liberals were very happy with the Court when it expanded rights and federal overreach. Now they are unhappy because the Court is more conservative. Strict construction is critical; otherwise we get political decisions. Mr. Walpin details very well how too often the Court legislates. It is a case of whose ox is gored. Unelected justices should be more careful. Robert Ravitz
This book makes it clear. The reason why this court's justices must have term limits. The author gives example upon example as to how this court has shredded the founding fathers intents.
Both liberals and conservatives promote their ideologies by evoking America's most important document. the Constitution, but very few have read it, understand its intent and its impact on American civil life.
Gerald Walpin comes to the rescue with this indispensable book. In “The Supreme Court vs. The Constitution,” in elegant prose coupled with meticulous research, he demonstrates how justices have based critical decisions on politics and a desire to implement a particular agenda. In his own words “You don’t have to be a lawyer to understand how Supreme court Justices have substituted their own elitist vision for constitutional guarantees that protect the average American’s security and values.”
One particular egregious example is the passage of the Miranda law. How many times have we seen a movie or a column on a criminal being told his “Miranda rights?” Have you wondered why violent criminals have these rights which exclude confessions from admissible evidence?
Gerald Walpin reminds us “…the primary function of government…is to render security to its subjects. And any mischief menacing that security demands a remedy commensurate with the evil.”
Until the Miranda Law, the Supreme Court held that a confession obtained while the defendant was in custody was admissible, without any specific required procedures, as long as evidence showed that it was freely given and not induced by fear or threats.
Nonetheless, in 1966 five justices, outvoted four colleagues, and in Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court, ruled that persons in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed they have the right to remain silent, and that anything the person says will be used against that person in court. Failure to adhere to this will result in dismissal of the case even against hardened and dangerous criminals.
Gerald Walpin demonstrates how the law and its practice violates the intent of the Constitution and quotes Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, dissenting almost two decades later in 1985 “The failure of police to administer Miranda warnings does not mean that the statements received have actually been coerced’ and ”when the admission is not coerced, little justification exists for permitting the highly probative evidence of a voluntary confession to be irretrievable lost to the fact finder.”
This is one of the many gems in this book. There are many, many more.
Mr. Walpin has written many excellent columns on the debates in our judicial system- on Race and the Law and the Supreme Court, the misuse of the 14th Amendment to foster illegal immigration, New York's "stop and frisk" decision, NSA surveillance, to name a few.
The Supreme Court vs, The Constitution makes the debate about original intent and practice intelligible for non lawyers. It is highly recommended.
This book reveals how much activist judges have overstepped their authority since the very beginning of our great nation. What I find most troubling is that all judges have to swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution and then most of them seem to just ignore that oath. Maybe they don't understand the words which is even more troubling if that's the case.
Just one note to the author in case he reads these reviews if I'm playing golf and I happen to shank a shot and utter the word $***, I'm not literally referring to my 8-iron as a piece of excrement. The word is used as nothing more than a feeling of exasperation.
0 Response to "[BGI]≡ [PDF] Free The Supreme Court vs The Constitution eBook Gerald Walpin"
Post a Comment